Navigation Search

Select your location and role to view strategy and fund content

  • Global homepage
  • Australia
  • Belgique
  • Botswana
  • Denmark
  • Deutschland
  • España
  • Finland (Suomi)
  • France
  • Hong Kong (香港)
  • Ireland
  • Italia
  • Luxembourg
  • Namibia
  • Nederland
  • Norway
  • Österreich
  • Portugal
  • Singapore
  • South Africa
  • Sweden (Sverige)
  • Switzerland
  • United Kingdom
  • United States
  • International
Professional Investor
  • Professional Investor

This website is for Wholesale Clients (as defined in the Corporations Act and applicable regulations) only and provides information on our products, strategies and services. Please remember capital is at risk and past performance is not a guide to the future.

By entering you agree to our Terms & Conditions

2019 Investment Views

Defensive Solutions

PDF Library

Diversified investing against a headwind

By Michael Spinks and Atul Shinh

At a glance

  • We identify three main drivers that could continue to dominate the investing environment and resulting strategy: receding liquidity, slower global growth and populist shifts in the political order.
  • We approach 2019 with cautious positioning. Growth orientated positions that pay us an attractive risk premium and are capable of compounding investor returns over the long term are still warranted.
  • The regime has clearly shifted however and this justifies a broad range of Defensive and Uncorrelated strategies as well.
  • We expect this shift to lead to more attractive risk premia than has been the case for some time. Our ability to exploit these will be a key factor in future returns.

Three drivers into 2019

Global economic growth diverged in 2018, with the US economy supported by a large dose of fiscal stimulus through tax-cuts and public spending hikes. In contrast, most of the rest of the world is seeing the opposite with developed markets (ex-US) and emerging markets coming under pressure as China reduced its stimulus and rising US interest rates squeezed liquidity.

As US fiscal stimulus wanes and interest rate increases bite, we expect a deceleration of the US growth trajectory. More specifically we have identified three primary drivers that broadly characterise the investing environment for our strategy:

Receding liquidity
Large central banks withdrawing extraordinary money policies and US interest rates rising.
Slower global growth
The US should revert to a trend rate of growth, or potentially below trend, as the effects of fiscal stimulus wane.
Populist shifts in political order
Politics and related policies, such as import tariffs, may continue to upset markets.

Receding liquidity

Strong liquidity has fuelled the recovery since 2009, with low interest rates and aggressive central bank buying of government and corporate bonds. However, global liquidity is now reducing, driven by US interest rate hikes and the US Federal Reserve’s quantitative tightening (QT), which accelerated at the end of October with a monthly rate of US $50 billion a month. Contrast that with a positive monthly purchase rate of US $85 billion at the peak of the third round of quantitative easing. The US Federal Reserve will likely focus on broad financial conditions, which could well stay loose even as monetary policy tightens due to the build-up of capital through private market channels being redeployed into lending opportunities. This could push interest rates higher than the market currently expects.

The Federal Reserve is not the only central bank withdrawing liquidity with the European Central Bank and Bank of Japan also shrinking their balance sheets through the year. With low interest rates and extraordinary monetary measures acting as a source of support for markets for nearly ten years, the slow withdrawal of liquidity clearly creates risks given the market’s sensitivity to the cost of money (Figure 1).

Figure 1: US Federal Reserve balance sheet set to shrink.

US Federal Reserve balance sheet set to shrink

Source: Bloomberg, as at 30.10.18.

Global growth slows

Over 2018, the growth impetus was driven by the US, while other regions slowed more decisively. The tax cuts and spending that targeted US companies and consumers will likely only have a short-term impact. Growth may fade, with the potential impact of tariffs increasing uncertainty for business and pushing up costs.

Figure 2: Fiscal stimulus continues to support the US economy

Fiscal stimulus continues to support the US economy

Source: Bloomberg, as at 31.10.18

The significant divergence between the US and the rest of the world would seem to suggest a heavy exposure to US assets. However, we believe this divergence is well priced into many investments, potentially limiting any upside. In addition, the rally in US assets hasn’t been of particularly high quality. For instance, ten primarily technology stocks explain 50% of S&P returns year-to-date, highlighting the narrowness of this market and vulnerability to shocks.

Populist shifts in political order

The global political order is shifting, which has the potential to continue to unsettle markets. The rise of a populist and anti-EU party in Italy, along with the structural inadequacies of the euro zone, have resulted in meaningful divergence in the performance of the core versus periphery1. The core has benefited significantly from an undervalued currency. On the other hand, the periphery is saturated with debt, has a highly leveraged banking system, declining working age populations and stagnating productivity. We believe the odds are stacked against the euro zone growing out of its current troubles. While this will play out over a multi-year time horizon, the change in politics increases near-term instability.

An explicit focus on US national interest from the Trump administration has come through in the application of sanctions as a form of economic warfare and tariffs to force negotiation of existing trade treaties. History shows that protectionist policies can quickly become competitive, reinforcing and destructive. There are clear losers from rising protectionism, such as South Korea, as well as those which could benefit from a de-escalation of this rhetoric, like Canada.

Positioning in this environment

Macro concerns are an enduring feature of markets and over the past 10 years asset markets have generally surmounted them. At this time, the valuation of many assets and high company margins raises the risks from slower growth, tighter liquidity and less predictable politics. These concerns suggest a cautious positioning, with diversity designed to help offset these risks alongside target Growth-orientated positions. The potential shift in the liquidity environment could expose the weaker links in global financial markets.

We hold positions that continue to offer meaningful long-term return potential and predominantly take this risk through equity markets rather than debt or currency. The core of our equity exposure is invested in a ‘total-return’ approach. This approach seeks to invest in high-returning companies that are underappreciated by the market for their ability to reinvest their profits and compound returns sustainably due to their durable competitive advantages that compound with time. We continue to find companies that satisfy these criteria.

However, years of extraordinary liquidity provision and low interest rates have compressed the risk premia offered by the full range of asset classes, which inflated valuations. This has particularly been the case for income-generating asset classes. Likewise, the sharp increases in capital flowing to private debt markets indicate the tail end of this trend.

Growth divergence and shifting interest rate policy over the past year has however introduced some valuation dispersion within asset classes, taking Asian equities relative to the US as one example. We expect the macro risks and regime shifts over the next year to generate attractive opportunities and greater variability in risk premia. Achieving our return objectives requires us to increase portfolio risk at times when there are more plentiful opportunities. We will take advantage of these as they arise.

1Germany is at the centre of the ‘core’ group of countries in the euro zone, while Greece, Italy, Portugal and Spain are conventionally seen as forming the ‘periphery’ ( LEQS-Discussion-Papers/LEQSPaper104.pdf)

Dynamism and selectivity is key

By Jeff Boswell & Garland Hansmann

At a glance

  • Underlying corporate fundamentals remain reasonably sound, although certain cyclical sectors are showing early signs of strain.
  • With more divergent performance across credit markets in 2018, the attractiveness of valuations differs quite markedly across credit sectors, with pockets of attractiveness contrasting with areas that look particularly expensive.
  • Market price behaviour has been the key driver of credit markets in 2018 and is likely to continue in its starring role.
  • While too early to get unduly defensive, we believe increased selectivity is required.
  • Getting portfolio positioning right can lead to significant outperformance in these markets.

2019: What are the drivers?

As we progress further into an era of reduced central bank support and tightening liquidity, we believe that while fundamentals and valuation will play a role, market price behaviour will remain the key driver in 2019. We still see good opportunities for investment in some credit markets, but increased bouts of volatility are likely to become the norm. The stage is set in the year ahead for the nimble, and well positioned investor, to take advantage of the move from quantitative easing to quantitative tightening (QE to QT). Below we use our ‘Compelling Forces™’ framework, segmenting credit market drivers into Fundamentals, Valuation and Market Price Behaviour, to examine these themes in more detail.

Fundamentals: Sound but not perfect

Going into 2019, the general fundamental backdrop remains sound. The auto sector aside, the robust growth experienced through much of 2018 is slowing rather than turning negative. As such, we think the threat of a very near-term recession is small. This macroeconomic strength has largely fed through to corporate earnings, particularly in the US. This has also translated into a continuing moderation in corporate leverage levels, which currently stand at elevated, but not overly aggressive levels. However, this varies somewhat by market.

It is notable, however, that certain subsets of the economy have recently shown signs of weakness. We have started to see a moderation of momentum in several of the traditionally more cyclical sectors, such as autos, industrials and homebuilders.

As individual issuers within these sectors have reported weaker financial performance, we have typically seen aggressive repricing of their equity or credit spreads, as illustrated below by the equity and bond prices of global chemicals manufacturer Trinseo (Figure 1). This asymmetric price reaction on any earnings miss clearly illustrates the increased value of selectivity.

Figure 1: Trinseo: equity and bond prices compared

Trinseo: equity and bond prices compared

Source: Bloomberg, 30.09.18.

However, this localised stress has yet to filter through into broader measures of market health. As such, default rates have continued to moderate, alongside continued positive ratings drift (more upgrades than downgrades) momentum.

Figure 2: Default rates are moderating

Default rates are moderating

Source: Moodys. As at 31.10.18.

Valuations: A mixed bag

In a year of more divergent performance across the credit market subsets, the relative attractiveness of different credit markets is currently quite variable. Certain subsets, such as US high yield, are trading close to post-crisis lows. Other segments, such as European high yield, have repriced wider since the start of the year. Figure 3 provides a snapshot of the large developed market bond markets, illustrating the variability of these valuations in the context of each asset classes' history.

Figure 3: Current corporate bond spreads, percentile against history

Current corporate bond spreads, percentile against history

Source: Deutsche Bank, FactSet (ICE BAML). 30.09.18.

The reasons for this valuation divergence differ from case to case. They can be idiosyncratic in nature (e.g. Italian political risk) or down to particularly supportive market technical factors (e.g. US high yield). We believe it is too difficult to generalise in terms of the attractiveness of valuations given the multitude of factors which need to be considered when assessing each market subset.

While we still see potentially attractive risk-adjusted returns across various subsets of the market, we think the year ahead is less about reaching for returns and more about preservation of capital. In this vein, dynamism and selectivity are going to be key to avoiding the more susceptible areas of the credit market.

Market price behaviour: A fine balance

In our view, market price behaviour will continue to be the main driver of markets in 2019. The ‘safe havens’ may not necessarily be where investors expect them, given the impact of extreme monetary policy over the last decade.

Credit markets, along with most financial markets, have benefited significantly in recent years from a wave of central bank liquidity. Easy money has rippled through all credit market subsets, providing a strong tailwind for tighter valuations, supported by improving underlying fundamentals. However, the recent shift from QE to QT, in our mind, is likely to have a material impact on market momentum. The retrenchment of tourist investors (tactical allocators), who don’t consider credit a mainstay of their investing, leaves some areas of the market susceptible.

As such, understanding the behavioural dynamics of individual market subsets is a key theme for us and further illustrates the need for selectivity. We believe this dynamic, along with issuance levels and fund flows, will likely have a meaningful impact on market direction in the year ahead.

Conclusion: We will stay invested, but be selective and dynamic

We believe there are still attractive risk-adjusted returns on offer among the different subsets of the credit market. However, we believe selectivity is going to be key in the year ahead, not only in terms of individual credit selection, but also in selection of subsets of the credit market. We also believe dynamism in both these regards is going to be critical in 2019.

Important information

This content is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as an offer, or solicitation of an offer, to buy or sell securities. All of the views expressed about the markets, securities or companies reflect the personal views of the individual fund manager (or team) named. While opinions stated are honestly held, they are not guarantees and should not be relied on. Investec Asset Management in the normal course of its activities as an international investment manager may already hold or intend to purchase or sell the stocks mentioned on behalf of its clients. The information or opinions provided should not be taken as specific advice on the merits of any investment decision. This content may contains statements about expected or anticipated future events and financial results that are forward-looking in nature and, as a result, are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, such as general economic, market and business conditions, new legislation and regulatory actions, competitive and general economic factors and conditions and the occurrence of unexpected events. Actual outcomes may differ materially from those stated herein.
In Australia, this document is provided for general information only to wholesale clients (as defined in the Corporations Act 2001). All rights reserved. Issued by Investec Asset Management, issued November 2018.