Navigation 搜尋
關閉

選擇您所在的位置及身份,以檢視策略及基金內容

Hong Kong (香港)
  • Global homepage
  • Australia
  • Belgique
  • Botswana
  • Denmark
  • Deutschland
  • España
  • Finland (Suomi)
  • France
  • Hong Kong (香港)
  • Ireland
  • Italia
  • Luxembourg
  • Namibia
  • Nederland
  • Norway
  • Österreich
  • Portugal
  • Singapore
  • South Africa
  • Sweden (Sverige)
  • Switzerland
  • United Kingdom
  • United States
  • International
專業投資者
  • 專業投資者
  • 一般投資者

本網站專為投資專才提供有關我們在產品、策略及服務方面的資料。請注意資本須承受風險,過往業績並不代表將來表現的指標。 我們使用cookies以確保本網站提供最佳的線上體驗,這包括來自第三方的cookies。 此類第三方cookies可能會跟踪您在本網站的使用情況。 如閱下繼續使用本網站,您確認願意接受所有cookies的使用。 請參閱我們的cookie政策以了解詳情,包括如何關閉cookies的步驟。

進入本網站,即表示您已同意我們的條款及細則
投資觀點

氣候投資: 負面情緒已夠了(只備英文版)

18 Feb 2020
作者: Graeme Baker投資組合經理, Deirdre Cooper投資組合經理

There are two ways to respond to the news that the world is miles from meeting its greenhouse gas emissions targets. You can feel depressed and hopeless, which is how most headline writers seem. The BBC’s “'Bleak' outlook as carbon emissions gap grows ” sums up the Eeyorish tone.  

Or, you can recognise that the climate crisis demands a forceful, positive response. Negativity isn’t getting us anywhere. Against the backdrop of the 25th COP summit, the annual meeting where national emissions targets are discussed, here are three reasons for investors to think (and act) positively. 

1) The focus is shifting to positive investment
As the director of the United Nations Environment Programme, the agency that compiles the Emissions Gap Report, says: "We need to catch up on the years in which we procrastinated." ‘Catching up’ means a massive and immediate acceleration of efforts to tackle climate change, because the 1.5C goal will be out of reach before 2030. Negative actions alone – cutting back consumption or, from an investment perspective, divesting from fossil fuels – won’t get us anywhere close. 

This shift in emphasis towards positive investment is good for the planet, because it raises the likelihood of meaningful action being taken. It’s also good for investors in decarbonisation, because it will strengthen the tailwind behind the businesses that are shifting the global economy to a lower-carbon model. 

Specifically, we need to invest positively in: transforming our energy infrastructure; electrifying transport and other systems; and vastly improving energy efficiency. There are potential investment opportunities across all three of these pathways to a lower-carbon economy. 

2) The risk of positive shocks may be rising 
Of course, the world is already investing to tackle climate change. We’re currently spending about one-quarter of the US$2.4 trillion required each year to stop temperatures rising dangerously. But even this is driving a powerful secular growth trend for select companies. The additional spending required to achieve global emissions targets would put that growth into hyperdrive. 

It remains to be seen whether the full investment will be made. But the UN’s latest dire assessment increases the likelihood of regulatory, technological or consumer-choice shocks to get emissions on track. (We talked briefly about the ‘inevitable policy response’ here.) Such shocks would be positive for decarbonisation companies and negative for businesses with high climate-risk exposure. 

To illustrate the growth potential of decarbonisation businesses, cutting emissions sufficiently to achieve the 1.5C goal would mean increasing wind and solar’s share of the energy mix from 7% to 70%. The proportion of electric cars on the road would need to reach 100%. That isn’t our base case, but we discussed why 2020 could be the year of the electric car here.  

As an aside, upside shocks would only be felt meaningfully in listed equities, which immediately price in changes in expected growth. Green bonds and private infrastructure – other ways that investors might seek exposure to decarbonisation – won’t respond in anything like the same manner, largely because their returns are contracted, which makes their valuations fairly stable. In other words, we think these asset classes offer neither the upside possibilities of listed equities, nor equities’ potential to hedge against transition risk.  

3) Positive political and business momentum 
Finally, we’ll offer a personal perspective on why we think investors should be positive: we have never seen such an intense focus on climate change. The global alarm at the UN’s emissions update tells you how far this issue has risen up the agenda.  

We’re seeing political responses that would have been unthinkable a few years ago. European industrial policy is now based entirely around the low-carbon economy, and the bloc may soon vote on a law that would halve emissions by 2030. In the US, some presidential candidates are proposing green agendas that would make European climate policy look retrograde. And the need for climate action is about the only thing the major parties contesting the UK general election agree on.  

The response from sections of the business community offers even more cause for optimism. There are some great decarbonisation enterprises with solid business models, impressive technologies and defensible competitive positions. There are also companies that don’t have these attributes – which is why we advocate a research-intensive, highly selective approach, because the winners of decarbonisation will be the companies that can generate sustainable returns from this structural growth trend. But with the right methodology, we think it’s possible to build a portfolio of durable businesses that are key enablers of decarbonisation. What’s more, investing in these companies will have a positive impact by aiding the transition to a lower-carbon economy. 

Let’s close with one more positive for investors. The consensus is forecasting lower growth for our proprietary universe of decarbonisation companies than for the market overall. To us, that makes no sense. But it also suggests opportunities to invest in businesses whose potential the market is yet to recognise. If that doesn’t sound like a reason to look forward more positively, we’re not sure what would. 

Graeme Baker
Graeme Baker 投資組合經理
Deirdre Cooper
Deirdre Cooper 投資組合經理

重要資訊

本通訊探討一般市場活動或行業走勢,不應視為預測、研究或投資建議而作為投資依據。本文中的任何內容均不應被視為簽訂任何合約的要約、投資意見、任何形式的建議、客戶招攬或投資於任何特定基金、產品、投資工具或衍生產品的要約。所發表的經濟及市場預測反映天達資產管理(「天達」)於所示日期的看法,可能會隨時轉變而毋須另行通知。概不保證所發表的觀點及意見的準確性,天達對買入或沽售特定證券的意向在未來可能會改變。所發表的投資觀點、分析及市場觀點可能並未反映天達整體的投資觀點,可能會根據不同的投資目標發表不同的觀點。天達根據內部建立數據、公開及第三方來源編制本通訊。雖然我們認為從公開及第三方來源獲得的資料是可靠的,但我們並未對其進行獨立驗證,無法保證其準確性或完整性。天達的內部數據可能未經審核。過往業績數據並非未來表現的指標。投資帶有風險。於香港,本公司的網站並未經香港證券及期貨事務監察委員會(「證監會」)審核。

本網站包含第三方網站的連結,這些網站並不受天達資產管理管制。因此,天達資產管理將毋須對任何連結網站的任何內容、服務、產品或資料承擔任何責任。閣下需承擔進入第三方連結網站的風險。連結到非附屬網站並非表示對此等網站提供的觀點、意見、產品、信息或服務表示認可或承擔任何責任。

除非另有授權,不得在未獲天達事前書面同意下展示、複印、傳送或向第三方提供本文資料。© 2019天達資產管理。版權所有。由天達資產管理於2019年12月發行。

中文譯本僅供參考,文義如與英文有差異,概以英文版本為準。

The content of this page is intended for investment professionals only and should not be relied upon by anyone else

Please confirm you fall under this category

進入本網站,即表示您已同意我們的條款及細則