Navigation 搜尋
關閉

選擇您所在的位置及身份,以檢視策略及基金內容

Hong Kong (香港)
  • Global homepage
  • Australia
  • Belgique
  • Botswana
  • Denmark
  • Deutschland
  • España
  • Finland (Suomi)
  • France
  • Hong Kong (香港)
  • Ireland
  • Italia
  • Luxembourg
  • Namibia
  • Nederland
  • Norway
  • Österreich
  • Portugal
  • Singapore
  • South Africa
  • Sweden (Sverige)
  • Switzerland
  • United Kingdom
  • United States
  • International
專業投資者
  • 專業投資者
  • 一般投資者

本網站專為投資專才提供有關我們在產品、策略及服務方面的資料。請注意資本須承受風險,過往業績並不代表將來表現的指標。 我們使用cookies以確保本網站提供最佳的線上體驗,這包括來自第三方的cookies。 此類第三方cookies可能會跟踪您在本網站的使用情況。 如閱下繼續使用本網站,您確認願意接受所有cookies的使用。 請參閱我們的cookie政策以了解詳情,包括如何關閉cookies的步驟。

進入本網站,即表示您已同意我們的條款及細則

Whilst the inclusion of China’s A-Shares in MSCI’s indices took its share of the limelight, the announcement of Chinese bond inclusion in Bloomberg Barclays’ Global Aggregate Index appears to have been less explored.

Despite being the world’s second largest economy and having the third largest bond market, exposure to China remains low in global portfolios. Wilfred Wee, Portfolio Manager, explores six reasons for investors to look at Chinese bonds as they increasingly evolve into a component of global portfolios

Investor focus is now on how to gain a foothold in the economic superpower that is China. Yet despite being the world’s second largest economy and having the third largest bond market, exposure to China remains low in global portfolios.

As access to China’s capital markets improve and international investors gain more insight into its fixed income asset class, we believe that Chinese bonds will increasingly feature in their portfolios. Over the last few years, we have seen an increase in holdings of onshore renminbi (CNY) bonds by foreigners, led by global reserve managers. By the end of the first quarter 2018, foreigners held CNY 1.4 trillion of onshore CNY bonds, three times the amount that was held four years prior[1].

Below, we give six reasons for our view that China’s current significant under-representation in global fixed income portfolios is set to change as foreign investors start to make allocations to an increasingly globally relevant asset class – and why.

  1. Chinese bonds exhibit developed market, rather than emerging market characteristics: China’s bonds tend to be viewed as being emerging market assets in terms of access and operations. However, we believe Chinese government bonds more closely resemble developed market (DM) assets, in terms of volatility and size. Over various time horizons, the volatility of Chinese government bonds has been lower than most DM bonds. Moreover, the volatility of the renminbi has been lower than most (if not all) DM currencies[2]. When considering these factors, we would argue that allocations to Chinese fixed income should be considered as part of overall DM bond exposures.
  2. Market likely to benefit due to inflows following index inclusion: In March 2018, Bloomberg announced that it would add renminbi-denominated government and policy bank securities to the widely followed Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Index from April 2019. While this is conditional, it is telling that on inclusion, local currency Chinese bonds will be the fourth largest currency component following the US dollar, euro and Japanese yen. Indications are that China’s weight will be 5.5% of this overall index[3]. At the same time, if China were to be included in the FTSE (previous Citi) World Government Bond Index at similar weights, as well JPM’s set of Emerging Markets Government Bond indices, its bond market would benefit from further inflows. If investors merely tracked these three index families, some US$300 billion would be invested in Chinese bonds over time. While not insubstantial, such inflows would only represent a fraction of China’s US$11 trillion onshore bond market and be easily absorbed.
  3. Chinese bonds may enhance investors’ overall portfolio risk-adjusted returns, given attractive yield pick-ups and diversification benefits: Aside from the sheer size and relevance of the market, we believe that investors will increasingly favour Chinese bonds because of their potential to significantly enhance overall portfolio risk-adjusted returns, given the yield and diversification benefits available. Chinese bonds offer healthy yields, providing an attractive pick-up versus developed market peers, according to our analysis[4]. Yields of onshore and offshore (‘dim sum’) Chinese government bonds are generally higher than those of large global peer markets. The credit rating of China’s sovereign debt is strong, and stacks up well against global developed market peers.[5]
  4. Diversified and attractively rated credit: Outside sovereign bonds, most Chinese corporates that have issued in the international dollar (‘kung fu’) bond market – which reference internationally accepted credit ratings by Moody’s, S&P and Fitch – are also of relatively high credit quality[6]. It’s easy to generalise that Chinese real estate bonds characterise the Chinese bond opportunity set. The reality, however, is that Chinese dollar bonds are diversified across sectors and predominantly rated investment grade. Comparing like for like, Chinese corporates can offer spread pick-up with lower duration risk. Comparing China credit spreads with US BBB credit spreads (bps) over the market cycle, those of Chinese companies have been greater than those of US BBB-rated peers, with lower duration risk.[7]
  5. Trade surplus supportive of renminbi: Invariably, investors are exposed to the Chinese currency when holding renminbi denominated bonds, whether onshore (CNY) or offshore (CNH). We believe that the renminbi can maintain and enhance its value versus major currency peers over the years ahead. Anchoring this view will be China’s ability to consistently run a trade surplus against major economies.
  6. Low correlations to other assets: Allocating to Chinese fixed income could improve overall portfolio risk-adjusted returns because of the diversification benefits provided by Chinese bonds. The returns of Chinese fixed income tend to be lowly correlated to other asset classes because China’s interest rate movements are predominantly determined by domestic factors. While these correlations may pick up as China integrates with the global capital markets, we believe they will be limited as China will increasingly become a maker of monetary policy and markets, rather than a taker of international prices.

 

    [1] Source: Bloomberg as at 31.03.18
    [2] Average 10 year Government bond yield (%) vs annualised volatility (%), 1, 3, 5, 7 years to end Mar 2018 & Annualised FX volatility (%, US$ Spot returns), Bloomberg as at 30.03.18
    [3]https://www.bloomberg.com/company/announcements/bloomberg-add-china-bloombergbarclays-global-aggregate-indices/. The inclusion is conditional on several planned operational enhancements being implemented, namely, implementation of delivery versus payment settlement, ability to allocate block trades across portfolios, and clarification on tax collection policies.
    [4] Onshore CNY & Offshore CNH Government bond yields versus DM bond yields, Bloomberg, JPM as at 27.04.18
    [5] Source: Bloomberg as at 30.04.18
    [6] Source: JP Morgan Asia (USD) Credit Index: China, Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan. Bloomberg as at 28.02.18
    [7] Source: Bloomberg, JP Morgan as at 27.04.18

回到 China, today

The content of this page is intended for investment professionals only and should not be relied upon by anyone else

Please confirm you fall under this category

進入本網站,即表示您已同意我們的條款及細則