Navigation Search
Close

Select your location and role to view strategy and fund content

United Kingdom
  • Global homepage
  • Australia
  • Belgique
  • Botswana
  • Denmark
  • Deutschland
  • España
  • Finland (Suomi)
  • France
  • Hong Kong (香港)
  • Ireland
  • Italia
  • Luxembourg
  • Namibia
  • Nederland
  • Norway
  • Österreich
  • Portugal
  • Singapore
  • South Africa
  • Sweden (Sverige)
  • Switzerland
  • United Kingdom
  • United States
  • International
Professional Investor
  • Professional Investor
  • Individual Investor

Tailored for investment professionals this site provides information on our products, strategies and services. Please remember capital is at risk and past performance is not a guide to the future. We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. This includes cookies from third parties. Such third party cookies may track your use of our website. By continuing you are confirming that you are happy to receive all cookies on our website. Please refer to our Cookie Policy for further information, including steps to take to disable cookies.

By entering you agree to our Terms & Conditions
Notes and musings from a Value investor

CRUNCHTIME

30 June 2017
Author: Alastair MundyPortfolio Manager

One of their current rebuttals to value investors from those investors not in the value church (and boy, there do seem to be a lot of them these days) is that our stocks are cheap for a reason. With the clearest value opportunities currently found in energy, banks and consumer-related stocks, it is true that there are some structural issues that value investors need to wrestle with. Although we would argue that some of these concerns are way over-cooked, some terribly clever chaps at Sanford Bernstein highlight that the dislike of value is now so great that it is apparent within many sectors.

The chart below illustrates this nicely and compares the cheapest stocks on price-to-book with the most expensive stocks across sectors. Their number crunching suggests that the cheap stocks look as cheap relative to the expensive stocks as they have done for 25 years and that value opportunities are becoming far more diverse.

Figure 1: Relationship of cheap stocks versus expensive stocks (on price to book) on an industry neutral basis
Europe

Source: Sanford Bernstein

We appear to have arrived at crunch time. The language of central bankers clearly modified at the end of June. They have clearly decided that enough is enough and that the time has come to start raising interest rates and discussing reversal of quantitative easing (whilst not shocking the market too much). They have a tariff of justifications for this ranging from the strength of the global economic upswing and the risks to inflation of the low levels of unemployment to a desire to reverse QE before the unknown risks of the initial strategy become apparent and to have interest rates at a decent level ahead of the next recession.

The market shrugged off this ‘forward guidance’ (remember that?) – either believing that the central bankers were all mouth and no trousers or that at the first signs of market weakness they would lose their nerve.

The market reaction could be too sanguine. Recent political results, the mood of the electorate and the language of central bankers suggests that whether the politicians like it or not we are transitioning from monetary policy to fiscal policy. Having previously had one huge buyer of government bonds (the central bank) the market could be looking at two big sellers (the government, to fund increased spending and the central bank reversing QE). With real yields standing at historically low levels this is a significant risk for bond prices and those assets most correlated to them.

What if the central banks fail to carry through this normalisation strategy? In this scenario the market could conclude that the new normal is low interest rates and QE forever; not necessarily an issue until the next recession, market crisis or if the unknown risks of QE become apparent. But a very unhealthy position to be in.

Our conclusion is that we are entering a new era. What has worked so well in a period of declining bond yields is likely to work badly as bond yields increase. Low risk becomes high risk and high risk morphs to low risk. There may be a few false starts to this process, but we prefer to be positioned early for this rather than battle with the masses to restructure a portfolio once momentum meaningfully changes direction.

Alastair Mundy
Alastair Mundy Portfolio Manager

Important information

This communication is provided for general information only should not be construed as advice.

All the information in is believed to be reliable but may be inaccurate or incomplete. The views are those of the contributor at the time of publication and do not necessary reflect those of Investec Asset Management.

Any opinions stated are honestly held but are not guaranteed and should not be relied upon.

All rights reserved. Issued by Investec Asset Management, issued June 2017.

The content of this page is intended for investment professionals only and should not be relied upon by anyone else

Please confirm you fall under this category

By entering you agree to our Terms & Conditions