Navigation Search

Select your location and role to view strategy and fund content

United Kingdom
  • Global homepage
  • Australia
  • Belgique
  • Botswana
  • Denmark
  • Deutschland
  • España
  • Finland (Suomi)
  • France
  • Hong Kong (香港)
  • Ireland
  • Italia
  • Luxembourg
  • Namibia
  • Nederland
  • Norway
  • Österreich
  • Portugal
  • Singapore
  • South Africa
  • Sweden (Sverige)
  • Switzerland
  • United Kingdom
  • United States
  • International
Professional Investor
  • Professional Investor
  • Individual Investor

Tailored for investment professionals this site provides information on our products, strategies and services. Please remember capital is at risk and past performance is not a guide to the future. We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. This includes cookies from third parties. Such third party cookies may track your use of our website. By continuing you are confirming that you are happy to receive all cookies on our website. Please refer to our Cookie Policy for further information, including steps to take to disable cookies.

By entering you agree to our Terms & Conditions
Notes and musings from a Value investor

The consequences of complacency

29 December 2017
Author: Alastair MundyHead of Value

As a team, we invest in companies that are significantly out-of-favour and cheap, based on a sensible assessment of their normalised profitability. A price we pay for doing this is that, generally things look fairly unattractive when we invest. But as believers in reversion to the mean, we believe there is an underappreciated tendency for companies that are doing badly to do better and for companies that are doing well to do worse.

And importantly, because out-of-favour companies are doing badly, they tend to be cheap. As an old stockbroker told me when I started out in investments, “We’re not here to find good or bad companies, young man. We’re here to find cheap and expensive ones.” Not all currently out-of-favour companies are necessarily bad, or the in-favour ones, good.

There are a number of drivers of reversion to the mean. One is good old competition. If a company or an industry is doing particularly well, then new capacity or new players are likely to enter the market. Whereas in a market that is performing poorly, there is lesser incentive for new players to enter.

Then there is regulation. Companies or markets that are doing particularly well, are more likely to attract adverse regulatory changes. This is far less likely in industries that are struggling, where there is scope for favourable regulatory changes.

Investors should also acknowledge the unpredictability of the future. Human beings tend to think they have better foresight than they actually do. Life throws us curve balls, and sometimes we do not see them coming. And with popular companies priced predominantly for a stream of good news, the risk is that some of these surprises are bad and can dilute the stock’s attraction. With unpopular companies priced predominantly for bad news, surprises are more likely to improve the mix.

The driver of change in fortune that I personally find interesting is complacency. It receives relatively little attention, and yet, I suspect that it is much more powerful than most people give it credit for. You can see it in the attitude of a company’s management team when you meet them. The management of a company that is doing well are generally praised, are typically well paid and look to have promising careers ahead of them. Faced with this, it is hard not to relax to some degree, and unfortunately this comes at a time when the other drivers of the change in fortune are building in the background, to make things more challenging.

By comparison, the management of a company that is not doing well are likely to be criticised in the press and be under pressure from their shareholders. The amount that they are being paid is likely to be suffering and their jobs could well be at risk. It is only human nature for this to get you out of bed a bit earlier in the morning, and for it to make a management team focus more clearly on realising shareholder values. Costs are likely to come under greater scrutiny, and previously unpalatable, but value-enhancing disposals or corporate activities are more likely to be considered.

For these and other reasons, we believe the odds of investment success are more in your favour when you invest in unpopular assets. And that is what we will continue to do.

Alastair Mundy
Alastair Mundy Head of Value

Important information

This communication is provided for general information only should not be construed as advice.

All the information in is believed to be reliable but may be inaccurate or incomplete. The views are those of the contributor at the time of publication and do not necessary reflect those of Investec Asset Management.

Any opinions stated are honestly held but are not guaranteed and should not be relied upon.

All rights reserved. Issued by Investec Asset Management, issued December 2017.

The content of this page is intended for investment professionals only and should not be relied upon by anyone else

Please confirm you fall under this category

By entering you agree to our Terms & Conditions